Southfield Park Floodlight Plan Sparks Wildlife Concerns
Light pollution from upgraded basketball court feared
Most residents agree the basketball court needs an upgrade
August 31, 2025
Plans to refurbish a disused basketball court in Southfield Park, have drawn criticism from local residents and conservation advocates. They are warning that the proposed installation of year-round floodlighting could pose a serious threat to the park’s wildlife habitat.
The application (252815FUL), submitted by the London Borough of Ealing seeks to convert the worn court into a Football Foundation PlayZone with upgraded fencing, gates, sporting equipment, and floodlights operating until 10pm every day of the year. While many residents support the idea of revitalising the neglected space, the inclusion of floodlighting has become a flashpoint for concern.
Nick Mander, a local resident whose home backs onto the park, has written to the London Wildlife Trust urging intervention. In his correspondence, Mr Mander acknowledges the need for refurbishment but argues that the floodlights would “cause significant damage to the wildlife of the park, particularly the wooded copse surrounding the site which is a haven for wildlife and some endangered species.”
The woodland in question was planted in the 1980s and has since become a habitat for a range of species, including owls, woodpeckers, long-tailed tits, and bats. Of particular concern is the population of stag beetles—a protected species in decline—which has been carefully nurtured by Ealing’s Ranger Service over the past two decades. In 1999 and again in 2005, rangers discovered hundreds of stag beetle larvae in the woodchip path laid through the copse, prompting habitat enhancements that continue to this day.
Opponents believe that habitat enhancements to encourage biodiversity may be undermined.
Residents fear that the introduction of artificial lighting could disrupt nocturnal species, interfere with breeding cycles, and degrade the ecological integrity of the area. “The tennis courts next to the proposed pitch do not have floodlighting,” Mr Mander noted, “so there is no reason why the new pitch should.” He also questioned whether the council’s apparent partnership with a commercial football operator had influenced the decision, suggesting that ecological considerations may have been sidelined.
According to guidance from the Institution of Lighting Professionals and the Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, floodlight design must minimise light spill, avoid disruption to local ecology, and adhere to curfew conditions where appropriate.
Many residents only became aware of the application days before the submission deadline, leaving little time for formal objections. There have so far been 15 comments on the proposal, 13 of which are opposed. Several neighbours have since lodged concerns, citing the impact on biodiversity and the lack of community consultation.
The PlayZone aims to improve access to high-quality sports facilities, particularly for priority groups identified by the Football Foundation—such as women and girls, disabled people, ethnically diverse communities, and those from lower socio-economic backgrounds. The facility is intended to support physical activity during winter months and provide opportunities for coaching and recreation.
The system comprises four 8m-high fence-mounted luminaires. The lighting design meets Football Foundation standards for average lux and uniformity, and the fencing is coloured moss green to minimise visual impact. A document submitted with the application states that it would have minimal impact on neighbouring residents or local biodiversity.
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism. Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets. We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more. However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do. We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area. A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site. One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute. If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor. For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site. |