Nurse Who Worked at Local Hospitals Struck Off


Panel finds Anthony Andrews acted 'dangerously and dishonestly'

The Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability
The Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability. Picture: Google Streetview

January 16, 2026

A mental health nurse, who worked at The Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability and St. George’s Hospital, has been struck from the register after giving a patient the wrong medication through their tracheostomy, despite their family trying to stop him. Anthony J B D P Andrews was found to have acted dangerously and dishonestly while working as an agency nurse in South West London.

A Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) misconduct panel ruled Mr Andrews’ fitness to practise as a nurse was impaired after holding hearings in December, which he did not attend. In a new report released this month, the panel said his misconduct had put patients at risk.

Mr Andrews was employed as a mental health nurse by two agencies, Care Staff Solutions and Pulse Nursing, and his work placements included The Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability, in Putney, South West London and St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust and the NHS Talking Therapies team at West London NHS Trust.

The panel found Mr Andrews gave a patient medication they were not prescribed using an unsafe route through their tracheostomy – an opening in their throat – which would have taken “considerable force”, on September 8, 2023. The patient, who was not under his care, began to cough and show signs of respiratory distress before they were stabilised.

The patient’s family reported that they had tried to stop Mr Andrews, but he ignored them and continued administering the medication into the tube. The panel found the medication Mr Andrews gave the patient was incorrect, as he had mistaken them for someone else and failed to check their records.

On the same day, Mr Andrews was found to have given medication to another patient without checking their records.

Mr Andrews was also found to have accepted the shift when he knew he did not have the skills needed to work in tracheostomy care, deliberately misleading the ward manager by lying that he was trained in it. The panel said this was “egregious and deplorable”.

The panel also found Mr Andrews failed to provide South West London and St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust with a copy of temporary restrictions that had been placed on him by the NMC in 2021.

It ruled he then breached this order by failing to notify the NMC within seven days of a medication error he had made in May 2022. He was also found to have worked five shifts for West London NHS Trust without telling them of an interim suspension order that had been imposed on him in November 2023, as he had deliberately not checked the outcome of the hearing.

The panel ruled Mr Andrews’ actions had fallen significantly short of the standards expected of a registered nurse and amounted to misconduct.

The report said, “The panel determined that patients were put at risk and there was serious potential risk of harm as a result of Mr Andrews’ misconduct. Mr Andrews’ misconduct had breached fundamental tenets of the nursing profession and therefore brought its reputation into disrepute.”

The panel said Mr Andrews had shown some remorse, but there was no evidence he understood the seriousness of his actions and their impact on patients’ safety.

The report added, “The panel determined that there is a risk to the public as Mr Andrews’ conduct was dangerous and dishonest and is unremedied. Due to a lack of insight, remediation and strengthening of practice, the panel decided that a finding of impairment is necessary on the grounds of public protection.”

The panel decided to strike Mr Andrews from the register.

Charlotte Lilywhite - Local Democracy Reporter

Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.